<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Permanent Records</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alchemicalmusings.org/2006/04/01/permanent-records/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alchemicalmusings.org/2006/04/01/permanent-records/</link>
	<description>Aurum nostrum non est aurum vulgi</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 17:17:01 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alchemical Musings &#187; &#8220;Wait until pictures start getting indexed.&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://alchemicalmusings.org/2006/04/01/permanent-records/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Alchemical Musings &#187; &#8220;Wait until pictures start getting indexed.&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2006 22:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alchemicalmusings.org/?p=21#comment-44</guid>
		<description>[...] Pervasive Omniscient Surviellance will have an impact on the basic fabric of personal social and cultural interactions as we currently understand them. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pervasive Omniscient Surviellance will have an impact on the basic fabric of personal social and cultural interactions as we currently understand them. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alchemical Musings &#187; Zyprexa Memos Released Using Tor</title>
		<link>http://alchemicalmusings.org/2006/04/01/permanent-records/comment-page-1/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Alchemical Musings &#187; Zyprexa Memos Released Using Tor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Dec 2006 16:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alchemicalmusings.org/?p=21#comment-43</guid>
		<description>[...] However, there is another important angle to this story relating to the relationship between anonymity and freespeech, especially in a world of omniscient surveillance. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] However, there is another important angle to this story relating to the relationship between anonymity and freespeech, especially in a world of omniscient surveillance. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alchemical Musings &#187; One Lost-identity Per Child</title>
		<link>http://alchemicalmusings.org/2006/04/01/permanent-records/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Alchemical Musings &#187; One Lost-identity Per Child</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 05:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alchemicalmusings.org/?p=21#comment-32</guid>
		<description>[...] But there is another freedom at stake here - one I have explored in the past (permanent records) - the freedom to remain anonymous, which is the keystone supporting personal privacy, which I am beginning to believe ought to be a basic human right. I started thinking about how these laptops could easily become the instruments for an international id program, and for all the reasons that people are concerned about this, OLPC should seriously consider shipping with tools which support anonymous network activity. Tools like TOR, which regrettably the EFF has just had to cut funding for&#8230; If you think this is important, perhaps you might want to chime in, and let laptop people know. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But there is another freedom at stake here &#8211; one I have explored in the past (permanent records) &#8211; the freedom to remain anonymous, which is the keystone supporting personal privacy, which I am beginning to believe ought to be a basic human right. I started thinking about how these laptops could easily become the instruments for an international id program, and for all the reasons that people are concerned about this, OLPC should seriously consider shipping with tools which support anonymous network activity. Tools like TOR, which regrettably the EFF has just had to cut funding for&#8230; If you think this is important, perhaps you might want to chime in, and let laptop people know. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://alchemicalmusings.org/2006/04/01/permanent-records/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Apr 2006 22:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alchemicalmusings.org/?p=21#comment-28</guid>
		<description>As one who attends a lot of open source/hacker conferences and academics ones, it is a shame that academic ones don&#039;t mix it up a little more as do the developers cons. It was for this reason that I am extra-excited that &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.4sonline.org/meeting.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;4S&lt;/A&gt; has now moved to mixed formats, including:


************
Some sessions at the Vancouver 4S will be designated &quot;working sessions&quot; for which papers will be available online in advance, and allotted time will be primarily for discussion. If you would like to organize a working session please contact Josh Greenberg, Tarleton Gillespie , or Sergio Sismondo

Some sessions at the Vancouver 4S will be designated &quot;new media&quot;. If you would like to organize a session or participate in one please contact Linda Layne.
 ****

4S so far as been one of my favorite conferences (and you should consider presenting there, folks dig open source there), and these new varied formats are an extra boon.

As per &quot;reading from papers&quot; I am mostly against it unless it is done well, and it is usually not done so at least 50% of the time (it is hard to write as if you are talking, we rarely do that type of writing). I appreciate it because the presenter can offer a more nuanced point but usually the presentation becomes to monotone to follow. Since it is expected where I present, I usually do so, but with a lot of free flow talking spread throughout.

biella</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As one who attends a lot of open source/hacker conferences and academics ones, it is a shame that academic ones don&#8217;t mix it up a little more as do the developers cons. It was for this reason that I am extra-excited that <a HREF="http://www.4sonline.org/meeting.htm" rel="nofollow">4S</a> has now moved to mixed formats, including:</p>
<p>************<br />
Some sessions at the Vancouver 4S will be designated &#8220;working sessions&#8221; for which papers will be available online in advance, and allotted time will be primarily for discussion. If you would like to organize a working session please contact Josh Greenberg, Tarleton Gillespie , or Sergio Sismondo</p>
<p>Some sessions at the Vancouver 4S will be designated &#8220;new media&#8221;. If you would like to organize a session or participate in one please contact Linda Layne.<br />
 ****</p>
<p>4S so far as been one of my favorite conferences (and you should consider presenting there, folks dig open source there), and these new varied formats are an extra boon.</p>
<p>As per &#8220;reading from papers&#8221; I am mostly against it unless it is done well, and it is usually not done so at least 50% of the time (it is hard to write as if you are talking, we rarely do that type of writing). I appreciate it because the presenter can offer a more nuanced point but usually the presentation becomes to monotone to follow. Since it is expected where I present, I usually do so, but with a lot of free flow talking spread throughout.</p>
<p>biella</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
